...genetic science has discovered that variations, which Darwin thought could account for 'the origin of species,' actually do no such thing . For this reason evolutionary biologists were forced to distinguish between variation within species and the formation of new ones, and to propose two different concepts for these different phenomena. Diversity within a species - that is, variation - they called 'microevolution,' and the hypothesis of the development of the new species was termed 'macroevolution.'
These two concepts have appeared in biology books for quite some time. But there is actually a deception going on here, because the examples of variation that evolutionary biologists have called 'microevolution,' actually have nothing to do with the theory of evolution. The theory of evolution proposes that living things can develop and take on new genetic data by the mechanism of mutation and natural selection. However .. variations can never create new genetic information, and are thus unable to bring about 'evolution.' Giving variations the name of 'microevolution' is actually an ideological preference on the part of evolutionary biologists.
Taken from
Darwinsim Refuted
How the Theory of Evolution Breaks Down in the Light of Modern Science.
Harun Yahya
Goodword Publishing 2004
This capter places a sharp distinguishing line between microevolution (a.k.a variation) and macroevolution - which is based on the variation within genetic boundaries.
No comments:
Post a Comment